Are Shocks Permanent? The Dynamics of Stagnation and Hysteria in Turkey's Unemployment Rate and Proposed Solutions ThroughTourism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18095012Keywords:
Tourism, Unemployment Hysteria, Economic Shocks, Structural Break, Zivot_Andrews, Lee-StrazicichAbstract
This study tests the validity of the hysteresis hypothesis in unemployment by analyzing the long-term behavior of the unemployment rate in Turkey using annual data from 1988 to 2023. The hysteresis hypothesis posits that economic shocks create lasting effects on unemployment, preventing the series from returning to its previous equilibrium level. Within this framework, the stationarity properties of the unemployment rate were examined using ADF and PP unit root tests, while structural breaks were examined using Zivot–Andrews and Lee–Strazicich tests. Empirical findings show that the unemployment rate is not stationary at the level, follows an I(1) process, and that the effects of shocks are persistent rather than temporary. The Zivot–Andrews test detected significant structural breaks in the 2009 period, while the Lee–Strazicich test detected them in 2001 and 2018; however, despite the structural breaks, neither test rejected the unit root hypothesis. The results obtained show that unemployment shocks in Turkey are permanent in nature and that the labor market struggles to return to its natural equilibrium level due to loss of flexibility, skill mismatches, and institutional weaknesses. On the other hand, the study did not directly analyze the impact of tourism on unemployment, but emphasized that the tourism sector could play a buffering role in the labor market against economic shocks, and that structural reforms and sector diversification play an important role in reducing the persistence of unemployment. These findings indicate that unemployment is a structural problem in the Turkish economy and that long-term, comprehensive employment and education policies are necessary for lasting improvement, rather than short-term interventions.
References
Arestis, P. & Mariscal, I. B. F. (2022). Hysteresis in unemployment: Empirical evidence from Eurozone countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 49(5), 887–905. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-06-2020-0282
Atgür, M. (2021). Türkiye’de doğal işsizlik oranı hipotezinin geçersizliği ve işsizlikte histeri hipotezinin geçerliliği (1988–2018). Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(5), 1467–1481. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.766558
Ball, L. (1999). Aggregate demand and long-run unemployment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 189–251.
Ball, L. (2009). Hysteresis in unemployment: Old and new evidence (NBER Working Paper No. 14818). https://doi.org/10.3386/w14818
Blanchard, O. J. & Summers, L. H. (1986). Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1, 15–78. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1950
Camacho, M. (1997). Unemployment persistence in Spain: 1964–1995. Applied Economics Letters, 4(10), 645–649.
Camarero, M. & Tamarit, C. (2004). Hysteresis vs natural rate of unemployment: Some European evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 11(4), 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350485042000201653
Çat, S. & Kırca, M. (2024). Türkiye’de işsizlikte histeri etkisinin demografik gruplar bazında analizi: Fourier KPSS testi uygulaması. Ekonomik Yaklaşım. (Yayım aşamasında).
Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
Enders, W. (2015). Applied econometric time series (4th ed.). Wiley.
Galí, J. (2011). The return of the wage Phillips curve. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 436–461.
Güloğlu, B. & Altıntaş, H. (2006). Is the Turkish unemployment hysteretic? Applied Economics Letters, 13(14), 889–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500425621
Jaeger, A. & Parkinson, M. (1994). Some evidence on hysteresis in unemployment rates. European Economic Review, 38(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)90094-9
Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59(6), 1551–1580.
Karagöl, E. & Korkmaz, T. (2017). Türkiye’de işsizlikte histeri hipotezi: Zivot–Andrews testi ile bir analiz. Sosyoekonomi, 25(33), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.289891
Kocaaslan, O. K. (2021). Testing the hysteresis hypothesis in the Turkish labour market: Evidence from the rolling unit root approach. Applied Economics Letters, 28(9), 764–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1781762
Laryea, S. A. (2004). Unemployment hysteresis in developed and developing countries: A comparative analysis. Journal of Economic Studies, 31(5), 428–442.
Layard, R., Nickell, S. & Jackman, R. (1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford University Press.
Lee, J. & Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum LM unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082–1089.
Mitchell, W. F. (1993). Testing for unit roots and persistence in OECD unemployment rates. Applied Economics, 25(12), 1489–1501.
Nickell, S. (1997). Unemployment and labour market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.11.3.55
OECD. (2023). OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections. https://stats.oecd.org
Phillips, P. C. B. & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
Roed, K. (1997). Hysteresis in unemployment. Journal of Economic Surveys, 11(4), 389–418.
Şahin, A. & Çalışkan, G. (2020). Türkiye’de işsizlikte histeri etkisi: Doğrusal olmayan birim kök testi. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 31(117), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.5455/ey.13412
TÜİK. (2024). İşgücü istatistikleri (1988–2023). https://data.tuik.gov.tr
Uysal, G. & Acar, S. (2020). Türkiye’de kadın ve genç işsizliğinde histeri etkisi. Çalışma ve Toplum, 3, 1291–1318.
Yalçınkaya, E. & Güngör, S. (2019). Türkiye’de işsizlik oranının durağanlık analizi: Yapısal kırılmalı birim kök testleri. Maliye Finans Yazıları, 113, 65–92.
Yıldırım, H. & Yavuz, N. Ç. (2022). COVID-19 sonrası Türkiye’de işsizlikte histeri etkisi: Fourier KPSS testi ile analiz. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1083481
Zivot, E. & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Social Sciences Academic Development Journal (SOBAG)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
