The Concept of Rationality in Economics Schools from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics

Authors

Keywords:

Concept of Rationality, Behavioral Economics, Consumer Behavior

Abstract

Economics is a branch of social science that studies economic processes such as allocation of resources, production, distribution and consumption. This branch of science, which forms the basis of economic thought, aims to make societies make decisions about how to use resources and analyze the economic consequences of these decisions. This branch of science strives to understand, explain and predict the economic behavior of individuals, firms and states. Behavioral economics, which is within the science of economics, is a perspective that offers a critical approach to traditional economic theories. Behavioral economics proposes that individuals' economic decisions are often influenced by emotional, psychological, and social factors rather than being rational. In this context, the concept of "rationality" in the behavioral economics perspective is treated differently from its meaning in neoclassical economic theories. Consumer behavior is an important topic within behavioral economics. Understanding people's economic decisions, such as shopping, consumption and saving, allows economic models to better fit real-world behavior. The purpose of this study is, in the first chapter, to examine the conceptual origins and history of the concept of rationality and the existence of this concept in traditional economics schools and the criticisms brought to this concept. In the second part, we examine the emergence, development and conceptual framework of behavioral economics. In the last section, models that explain consumer behavior within the framework of behavioral economics and the factors affecting consumer purchasing decisions are examined in detail.

References

Abbas, M. H. I. (2020). A rational irrationality: Reviewing the concept of rationality in conventional economics and Islamic economics. Al-Amwal: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syari'ah, 12(1), 77-85.

Altman, M. (2013). Hayek’s complexity assumption, ecological and bounded rationality, and behavioral economics. In Hayek and behavioral economics (pp. 221-262). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Angner, E. & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Behavioral economics. Handbook of the philosophy of science: Philosophy of economic, 641-690.

Arxer, S. L., Van Lear, W. & Lodge, P. (2011). The keynesian revolution: Market rationality and socially sensitive economics. Toward A Post-Market Society, 49-69.

Bilovodska, O. & Poretskova, M. (2023). Barriers to online purchase: Case study consumer behaviour in fashion industry e-commerce. Economic Journal of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 2(34), 102-112.

Blawatt, K. R. (2016). Marconomics: Defining economics through social science and consumer behavior. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Blinder, A. S. (2000). Central-bank credibility: Why do we care? How do we build it?. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1421-1431.

Boylan, T. & O'Gorman, P. (2013). Post-Keynesian economics, rationality, and conventions (pp. 62-79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9-64.

Caravale, G. (1987). The neo-keynesian school: Some internal controversies. Atlantic Economic Journal, 15(4), 1.

Cagan, P. (1980). Reflections on rational expectations. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 12(4), 826-832.

Çalık, Ü. & Düzü, G. (2009). İktisat ve psikoloji. Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler E- Dergisi

Dornbusch, R. & Fischer, S. (1986). The open economy: Implications for monetary and fiscal policy. In the american business cycle: Continuity and change (pp. 459-516). University of Chicago Press.

Duran, M. S. (2017). Kant’ın ödev ahlakı üzerine. Temaşa Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi, (6), 57-84.

Fiori, S. (2009). Hayek's theory on complexity and knowledge: Dichotomies, levels of analysis, and bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Methodology, 16(3), 265-285.

Foxall, G. R. (2017). Behavioral economics in consumer behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 40, 309-313.

Gertchev, N. (2007). A critique of adaptive and rational expectations. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 10(4), 313-329.

Giocoli, N. (2005). Modeling rational agents the consistency view of rationality and the changing image of neoclassical economics. Cahiers D’économie Politique, (2), 177-208.

Hahn, F. H. (1980). Monetarism and economic theory. Economica, 47(185), 1-17.

Hirshleifer, D. (2015). Behavioral finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7, 133-159.

Hursh, S. R. (1984). Behavioral economics. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42(3), 435-452.

Lagueux, M. (1997, June). The rationality principle and classical economics. In CONGRESS of History of Economics Society, College of Chalerston, Chalerston, SC.

Lee, C. & Green, R. T. (1991). Cross-cultural examination of the fishbein behavioral intentions model. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 289-305.

Lee, S. H. & Hoffman, K. D. (2015). Learning the shamwow: Creating infomercials to teach the AIDA model. Marketing Education Review, 25(1), 9-14.

Lovell, M. C. (1986). Tests of the rational expectations hypothesis. The American Economic Review, 76(1), 110-124.

Lü, R. & Hao, F. (2022). The development of rationality in economics. International Research in Economics and Finance, 6(1), 1.

Maslow, A. & Lewis, K. J. (1987). Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Salenger Incorporated, 14(17), 987-990.

Mullainathan, S. & Thaler, R. H. (2000). Behavioral economics.

Nagatsu, M. (2015). Behavioral economics, history of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2.

Prakash, A. (2016). Howard sheth model of consumer behaviour. Deliberative Research, 30(1), 43.

Prasad, R. K. & Jha, M. K. (2014). Consumer buying decisions models: A descriptive study. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 6(3), 335.

Ramos, J. (1989). Neo-Keynesian macroeconomics as seen from the South. CEPAL Review.

Roberts, J. H. & Lilien, G. L. (1993). Explanatory and predictive models of consumer behavior. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 5, 27-82.

Rutherford, M. (1984). Rational expectations and Keynesian uncertainty: A critique. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 6(3), 377-388.

Sendhil, M. & Thaler, R. (2000). Behevioral economics encyclopedia of social sciences.

Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations [1776] (Vol. 11937).

Solek, A. (2014). Behavioral economics approaches to public policy. Journal of International Studies, 7(2).

Şen, A. K. (1977). Rasyonel aptallar: İktisat teorisinin davranışsal temellerinin bir eleştirisi. Felsefe ve Halkla İlişkiler, 317-344.

Şeniğne, B. (2011). Rasyonalite kavramına deneysel ve davranışsal iktisat bağlamında yeni bir bakış açısı:“Nöroiktisat”, Doctoral dissertation, Marmara Universitesi ,Turkey.

Thompson, G. (1981). Monetarism and economic ideology. Economy and Society, 10(1), 27-71.

Vignali, C. (1999). Benetton's brand position explored and developed through Nicosia's consumer-behaviour model. Journal of the Textile Institute, 90(1), 48-59.

White, M. D. (2003). Reconciling homo economicus and John Dewey's ethics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 10(2), 223-243.

Zafirovski, M. (2008). Classical and neoclassical conceptions of rationality-findings of an exploratory survey. The Journal of Socio-economics, 37(2), 789-820.

Zhao, Q. & Hastie, T. (2021). Causal interpretations of black-box models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 39(1), 272-281.

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

ARSLAN, F. (2023). The Concept of Rationality in Economics Schools from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics. Social Sciences Academic Development Journal (SOBAG), 1(1), 53–72. Retrieved from https://sobag.org/index.php/pub/article/view/3

Issue

Section

Articles